![]() |
And Other Crazy People. |
![]() |
|
Tested
On Ice
|
|
My Seattle area commute has varying conditions throughout the ride. It can be snowing and freezing in one town, and blowing and raining in the next. I needed a warm winter jacket that was waterproof and not too sweaty. When I bought this jacket last year, I wondered about the price tag. It cost $159 for a "rain jacket". The jacket is ultra thin, made of pertex and is very durable. The folks at Showers Pass have been testing this jacket in Chicago and the Pacific NW for about 2 years. Unlike other pertex jackets, this one needs no special care and all seams are taped. I've worn this jacket for close to 2,000 miles without a problem. The jacket blocks wind, rain and cold and I've used it even in 15F temps along with a base layer and polar tech fleece layer. The jacket wicks water away from your skin but moisture tends to condense on the inner shell itself. When you take the jacket off, it dries quickly as in 10 minutes or so. Review by "Virginia Kelley" <virginia.kelley at comcast.net> |
|
Sealskinz Chillblocker Socks I got the socks on Friday. Sat. a.m. temps low 30's wind 5-15mph. I used the socks with sidi mega road shoes
with the Pearl Izumi Amfib booty. I lasted for 1.5hrs with pretty comfortable feet.
They were just starting to get cold. On Sunday, it was 35 degrees, wind 5mph, I wore the socks with neoprene toe covers, ok for 90 min. These are the best socks I've tried. In road shoes that are 1/2 to 1 size bigger than normal, since socks are thick. The socks fit well, are elastic, and stay up on the calf. I don't think, by themselves, they will bring you to temps below 25-30. I think they have a place for the roadie that's wants 2 hrs of comfort without the extra fuss and time putting on a booty. I also may have strapped the shoes too tight, decreasing evaporation and warmth so I still need to experiment with that. You still get some pedal feel with them on, and they are comfortable and conform to your foot nicely. Editors note: Sealskinz are water proof socks that have a breathable waterproof membrane between two heavy fabric layers. You can turn them inside out and fill them with water and they don't leak. Review By "NIcholas J. Peckio R.N." <endoboy at optonline.net> |
|
Vulpine Adaptive ICEBIKE Mittens
In addition the super bright reflective tape makes signaling a turn to following traffic in darkness easy. Its bright!! The thumb is soft absorbent material for wiping your, ah, brow, yeah, that's it, your brow. SEE our Separate Review here. Opinion about the Company Here. |
Col d'Lizárd Polartec 100 Powerstretch Tights While riding home from work on a cold winter evening, I was making a mental note that the new Cannondale Heavy Weight tights were doing their job. It was Minus 12C (10F) and windy, but I was quite warm with just thin capilene long-johns under the tights. But they were are rather stiff, due to the wind proof front. In my mailbox were my long awaited "Experimental" Polartec 100 Powerstretch Tights from Col d'Lizárd. I call them experimental, because I believe I have serial number 002. (Number 001 went to a lucky ICEBIKER who works with Gekko.) I had been chatting via e-mail with Kathy Austin (the owner of this small Winter Park, Colorado company) and lamenting the difficulty of finding good winter tights. She suggested Powerstretch 100 might be good for this. The swatch she had mailed seems a little light. I was dubious.
Upon trying them on (over the capilene) I was surprised to find they really did STRETCH. They fit perfectly. (How could I have doubted?!?). I just HAD to test them on ice. So back out I went, into the pitch dark, with batteries still half depleted from my commute. I headed for a trail that had some rather nasty ice knobs from the last thaw. The ice knobs were really sharp and rutted. I had to work to keep upright, and I noticed that the tights were noticeably less restricting than the Cannondales that I had on just half an hour ago. Beyond the ice knobs, I was into the wind. The Gekko tights were still very warm, with very little hint of cold wind blowing through. Powerstretch wasn't billed as wind proof, but it almost felt like it. Half an hour into the ride my lights started to dim, my batteries were getting low. On the run back, I noticed that there was no zipper grinding into my ankle where the tights went down into the boot. Yet there had been no problem getting them on over my foot. Stretchy stuff. Lots of flexibility. As I rolled into the yard, the lights were a mere glimmer, the battery had packed it in. But I was warm. I was also sold on these Col d'Lizárd Powerstretch 100 tights. At only $56, they had out performed the high priced tights from the big name company, and were substantially more breathable. Besides, I was tired of black anyway. Need to go colder? For -20C (-5F) add an underlayer with Col d'Lizárd Microfiber Tights. Review By ICEBIKER. |
Foxwear Cold Weather Tights
The small Idaho firm called Foxwear makes tights similar to those above but they are made out of 200 Weight Powerstretch. (300 Weight on request). The construction detail is very good, seams are strong and well made. The 200 weight Powerstretch tights are noticeably thicker than the 100 weight, but were still light and supple and form fitting. I expected the 300 weght to be bulky and uncomfortable, but they were every bit as comfortable as the 200. The 300 weight is almost windproof. Great for those really cold days. I think the 300 weight would easily be warm enough at -10F, (-23C). I reviewed both Blue and Black in two different weights and I like both. The tights lack gripper elastic in the cuffs, but ride-up didn't seem to be a big problem. They are cut long enough to make a good snow proof tuck into your boot. These tights are priced competitively ($40) and Lou Binik of Foxwear will make custom fitting adjustments if you ask. They also do custom fitting for women. Call or Email for a borschure with fitting instructions. Scroll down this page for a review of the Foxwear Jackets. Also availabel are hats (see review) and skin layer garments. Lou is an ICEBIKER himself and knows the fitting requirements of cyclists. Want a Second Opinion? Click here. Reviewed by The ICEBIKER |
Turtle Fur Sehllclava
The picture looks like an improvement over the version I got a few years ago. It's a Balaclava made of thick material around the neck, and thin material under the helmet. That way if you have a good snug fitting helmet it will still fit with the Balaclava. It's sort of like a thin Balaclava plus a neck tube, but the advantage is that with the pieces sewn together, the neck tube gets pulled up around your ears and held there. Review by Charles R. Sullivan |
| Sentinel
Jacket by The North Face
Using Gore's single-faced Windstopper fleece gives the Sentinel Jacket great flexibility and weight while still maintaining windproofness and breathability in cold weather activities. Supplex Nylon overlays in the shoulders and elbows provide superb abrasion resistance. Lighter weight than most basic fleece jackets, but cuts the wind like a shell piece. Wt. 20 oz. It is cut extra long, and therefore accommodates the cyclist's position on the bike. In addition the zip up neck keeps cold drafts out. Nice tight cuffs prevent snow up the arm should you need to part company with the machine temporarily. Because its so incredibly LIGHT in weight, it doesn't feel like it should be warm. But because it blocks all the wind, and still breaths, you end up staying warmer without getting that muggy feeling. Its easily good to 0F (-18C) with only a thin weight Polartec shirt below. With a heavy weight Polartec shirt, and a capilene skin-layer, I've personally ridden in this jacket to -15F (-26C). Its not cheap, about $195, but it may just be what you were looking for. ICEBIKER Wayne Estes has this to say about the Sentinel:
|
| Patagonia
Regulator R2 Jacket
The R2 weight is touted as lighter , more breathable, and warmer, than 8 oz fleece. Not advertised is the fact that this gear is twice as expensive as regular fleece. In spite of this I recently broke down and purchased an R2 jacket. This stuff is great. On a -10 c day I was able to go mush about wearing the R2 jacket, a microfibre undershirt and a polyester windshell. I remained comfortably warm even when not moving and rejoiced in the fact of wearing 3 layers without feeling like a nylon armadillo. Even when cranking through heavy mush there was no interior moisture buildup. Nice touches on the R2 are a drop beaver tail that keeps the small of the back toasty warm and a thick collar cuff. According to the Patagonia web site, R2 fabric is as warm as 8-oz. Synchilla®, but lighter and more compressible The R2 Jacket features: Full-length front zipper (offset at the neck) allows you to easily vent en route. Stretch panels in critical flex areas. Zippered handwarmer pockets and drop tail style. Fabric: 6.5-oz. Regulator R2 fabric (Polartec® Thermal Pro polyester); 6.5-oz. Lightweight Activist Fleece stretch fabric on sides of torso, at elbows and cuffs. US$129 when last checked. |
| Pearl
Izumi Prizm Jacket
This is still the only jacket I trust for cold winter cycling. Others may breath just as well, or block the wind, but no manufacturer makes a more reflective jacket. The Scotchlite taping is in the right spots on the florescent yellow material. The zipper gets stuck more than it should -- a problem I've noticed across the entire Pearl Izumi product line. It does have a draft flap, two front zippered pockets, and side fasteners for tightening the bottom fit. The collar is nice and high, though it could fit a little smaller, at least for me. The new Pearl Izumi Prizm jackets (ahown here) have less Scotchlite (cost $99) and are no longer available in all yellow. Reviewed by Todd Scott |
Performance Triflex Tights1. FIT. Unlike many winter tights that fit loosely these fit as snug as normal fall tights. Though this approach maintains the "cycling style" it seems to be less effective at keeping the legs warm than a loose fit. With a tight fit warm air cannot move around and an area of the tight that becomes cold stays pressed against the same patch of flesh. 2. CONSTRUCTION. The catalog description is accurate but the pair that I purchased has had a problem with seam integrity. The thicker material must be harder to align properly as several places weren't sewn with sufficient overlap and had to be hand sewn (by me) to keep from pulling apart. 3. Breathability/Waterproofness. This is where you can decide if the tights are right for you or not. The "Triflex" material that covers the front and center rear of the tights is *extremely* waterproof. For short rides this poses no problem and for wet/sloppy rides this is desirable. However, if you are riding for an extended period the lack of breathability. causes the same panels to become damp with sweat and lose quite a bit of insulating power. 4. WARMTH. Good (on my legs) from 35 f to around 10 f. Limited in the higher direction by sweating. Extendable to lower by wearing fall tights underneath and wind pants over. 5. OVERALL. These pants appear to be designed with the MTB rider in mind. They are well suited to short, wet, and cold rides. In a commuting role they are less desirable because of the lack of breathability. Not as warm as looser fitting fleece-type tights with windproof front panels. Review By Ric Miller |
|
VisorGogs
I am a prescription glasses wearer, so I never got cycling glasses. Rudy Project makes some cycling glasses with Rx inserts. This seemed interesting to me, but I didn't feel like carrying 2 sets of glasses everywhere and didn't want to get contacts. Also the price of Rudy Projects is pretty expensive at $140 before you get the Rx lenses. The visorgogs seemed to be worth trying on several counts: - the price is $6.90 + shipping. Can't beat that. The price of cycling glasses has seemed too high to justify looking into them. I was not interested in paying over $100 to carry around 2 pairs of glasses. - Visorgogs fit over regular glasses After getting them within a week, there was another big plus: - Visorgogs can easily be stored away in a pannier when you're not using them, unlike other solutions. I figured that I would only consider wearing them when the temps were below +20F or when I was riding into snow or sleet. Initially, when I put them on, I was a little disappointed because the lens does touch my glasses and rest on them. Also, the visor didn't seem to match the forehead well. However, these points didn't seem to matter, because it stayed in place and didn't squish my glasses on my face and I'm usually wearing the Balaclava anyway. I guess the biggest negative is that it is a visor and since I ride a road bike, if I'm on the drops, I have to make a little more effort to look up, but no big deal. They work better than I expected. With regular glasses alone, cool air (below +20 F) easily streamed to my eyes and caused them to tear up even on mildly blustery days. With visorgogs I had virtually no tearing even riding into 15 mph wind. They cover almost all of the eyes, but have a breathing area near the ears and tiny holes in the visor. I haven't had any fogging up at all of either the visorgogs or my glasses. I pretty much like them and plan on wearing them at least below freezing. Review By Bob VonMoss |